Air Quality Rankings for California (2026)
California has 53 cities tracked by EPA air-quality monitors, with a state-wide 5-year median AQI of 49 — 8 points more polluted than the national average of AQI 41. Humboldt, California ranks #1 with the cleanest air (AQI 28, Grade A), while San Bernardino, California sits at the bottom (AQI 82, Grade F).
How California Compares
California has 53 cities tracked by EPA air-quality monitors, with a state-wide 5-year median AQI of 49 — 8 points more polluted than the national average of AQI 41. Humboldt, California ranks #1 with the cleanest air (AQI 28, Grade A), while San Bernardino, California sits at the bottom (AQI 82, Grade F). The rankings below are computed from the EPA Air Quality System (AQS), which aggregates daily AQI readings from federally certified monitors into annual averages. Cities are sorted by 5-year median AQI (lowest = cleanest = #1). The 5-year window smooths out year-to-year volatility from weather and wildfire events.
California is on an improving trajectory: 38 of 53 monitored cities show measurably cleaner air over the past decade, against just 9 that are getting worse. That mirrors the broader national pattern of falling particulate and ozone pollution as cleaner vehicles, cleaner power generation, and tighter industrial standards take effect.
The dominant pollutant across 27 of 53 California cities is Ground-Level Ozone. Ground-level ozone forms when sunlight reacts with vehicle and industrial emissions. It is worst on hot, sunny, stagnant summer days and is the leading air quality concern across much of the Sun Belt and California. Other California cities report Fine Particulate Matter (PM2.5) (26) as their dominant concern.
The fastest-improving city in California is Napa, California, with median AQI falling by 2.3 points per year. Steady improvement at that pace usually reflects fleet turnover (older diesels retiring), upwind power-plant retirements, or tighter regional emissions controls.
The city with the steepest decline is Mono, California, where median AQI is rising by 1.9 points per year. Rapid deterioration in a single city usually points to either wildfire-smoke exposure (in the West) or a new local emissions source — a power plant, port, or freight corridor coming online.
Full California Ranking
| # | City | 5yr Avg AQI | Current AQI | Worst Pollutant | Trend | Grade |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Humboldt, California | 28 | 32 | Ozone | Improving | A |
| 2 | Del Norte, California | 32 | 32 | PM2.5 | Worsening | C |
| 3 | Lake, California | 32 | 32 | Ozone | Improving | B |
| 4 | Trinity, California | 32 | 31 | PM2.5 | Worsening | C |
| 5 | Mono, California | 33 | 24 | PM2.5 | Worsening | D |
| 6 | Sonoma, California | 36 | 33 | Ozone | Improving | B |
| 7 | San Mateo, California | 36 | 31 | PM2.5 | Improving | B |
| 8 | Marin, California | 36 | 34 | PM2.5 | Improving | B |
| 9 | Amador, California | 37 | 36 | Ozone | Improving | B |
| 10 | Santa Cruz, California | 37 | 36 | PM2.5 | Stable | B |
| 11 | San Francisco, California | 38 | 32 | PM2.5 | Improving | B |
| 12 | Napa, California | 39 | 41 | PM2.5 | Improving | B |
| 13 | Monterey, California | 40 | 42 | Ozone | Stable | C |
| 14 | San Benito, California | 41 | 40 | Ozone | Stable | C |
| 15 | Siskiyou, California | 41 | 43 | Ozone | Worsening | D |
| 16 | Tuolumne, California | 41 | 43 | Ozone | Improving | B |
| 17 | Glenn, California | 43 | 41 | Ozone | Improving | C |
| 18 | Yolo, California | 43 | 43 | Ozone | Improving | B |
| 19 | El Dorado, California | 43 | 44 | Ozone | Stable | C |
| 20 | Calaveras, California | 44 | 40 | Ozone | Improving | B |
| 21 | Shasta, California | 44 | 45 | Ozone | Stable | C |
| 22 | Solano, California | 45 | 40 | PM2.5 | Improving | B |
| 23 | Tehama, California | 45 | 44 | Ozone | Stable | C |
| 24 | Mendocino, California | 46 | 53 | PM2.5 | Worsening | C |
| 25 | Santa Barbara, California | 46 | 45 | PM2.5 | Improving | B |
| 26 | Nevada, California | 47 | 42 | Ozone | Stable | C |
| 27 | Colusa, California | 47 | 55 | PM2.5 | Stable | C |
| 28 | Contra Costa, California | 48 | 51 | PM2.5 | Stable | C |
| 29 | Mariposa, California | 49 | 47 | Ozone | Improving | C |
| 30 | Santa Clara, California | 49 | 43 | PM2.5 | Stable | C |
| 31 | San Joaquin, California | 50 | 47 | PM2.5 | Improving | C |
| 32 | Alameda, California | 50 | 48 | PM2.5 | Improving | C |
| 33 | Ventura, California | 50 | 46 | PM2.5 | Improving | C |
| 34 | San Luis Obispo, California | 51 | 47 | PM2.5 | Improving | C |
| 35 | Butte, California | 52 | 50 | PM2.5 | Improving | C |
| 36 | Sutter, California | 52 | 49 | PM2.5 | Improving | C |
| 37 | Plumas, California | 52 | 50 | PM2.5 | Worsening | D |
| 38 | Sacramento, California | 53 | 51 | Ozone | Improving | C |
| 39 | Merced, California | 54 | 51 | Ozone | Improving | C |
| 40 | Orange, California | 54 | 52 | PM2.5 | Improving | C |
| 41 | Placer, California | 54 | 52 | Ozone | Worsening | D |
| 42 | Madera, California | 56 | 52 | Ozone | Improving | C |
| 43 | Inyo, California | 57 | 61 | Ozone | Worsening | F |
| 44 | Stanislaus, California | 57 | 54 | PM2.5 | Improving | D |
| 45 | Imperial, California | 61 | 61 | PM2.5 | Improving | D |
| 46 | Kings, California | 64 | 58 | Ozone | Improving | D |
| 47 | San Diego, California | 67 | 67 | PM2.5 | Stable | D |
| 48 | Fresno, California | 68 | 64 | Ozone | Improving | D |
| 49 | Tulare, California | 75 | 69 | Ozone | Improving | D |
| 50 | Los Angeles, California | 75 | 67 | PM2.5 | Improving | D |
| 51 | Kern, California | 77 | 69 | Ozone | Improving | D |
| 52 | Riverside, California | 82 | 79 | Ozone | Improving | D |
| 53 | San Bernardino, California | 82 | 71 | Ozone | Improving | F |
Air quality data for California is sourced from the EPA Air Quality System (AQS), which monitors outdoor air quality at thousands of stations nationwide.
Frequently Asked Questions
Humboldt, California has the best air quality in California with a 5-year average AQI of 28 and a Grade A (85/100). Its dominant pollutant is Ground-Level Ozone and the long-run trend is improving.
San Bernardino, California has the worst air quality in California with a 5-year average AQI of 82 and a Grade F (33/100). Its dominant pollutant is Ground-Level Ozone.
California has 53 cities with EPA air quality monitoring data, covering 2014-2023 of daily AQI measurements aggregated into annual averages.
California's state-wide 5-year median AQI is 49, 8 points more polluted than the national average of AQI 41. California is on an improving trajectory: 38 of 53 monitored cities show measurably cleaner air over the past decade, against just 9 that are getting worse. That mirrors the broader national pattern of falling particulate and ozone pollution as cleaner vehicles, cleaner power generation, and tighter industrial standards take effect.
Ground-Level Ozone is the dominant pollutant in 27 of 53 monitored California cities. Ground-level ozone forms when sunlight reacts with vehicle and industrial emissions. It is worst on hot, sunny, stagnant summer days and is the leading air quality concern across much of the Sun Belt and California.
California cities log an average of 25 days per year at "Unhealthy for Sensitive Groups" or worse, based on EPA monitor data over the last five years. Across all 53 California cities tracked, that totals 6,581 unhealthy days over the period.
Cities ranked by 5-year average AQI (lower is better). Grades factor in average AQI, trend direction, unhealthy days, and dominant pollutant.
The this entity category groups every U.S. air quality and pollution monitoring entity sharing this attribute. The list above is the data; the paragraphs below explain what the grouping means against the broader the EPA Air Quality System (AQS) distribution and how to read the relative rankings within the category.
For readers using this category as a starting point, the per-entity detail pages linked from the table above carry the underlying the EPA Air Quality System (AQS) data in full. The category-level view is the filter; the per-entity pages are the actual answer.
Source: EPA Outdoor Air Quality Data, 2026.